IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v111y2024i3p771-788..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Graphical tools for selecting conditional instrumental sets

Author

Listed:
  • L Henckel
  • M Buttenschoen
  • M H Maathuis

Abstract

SummaryWe consider the efficient estimation of total causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding using conditional instrumental sets. Specifically, we consider the two-stage least-squares estimator in the setting of a linear structural equation model with correlated errors that is compatible with a known acyclic directed mixed graph. To set the stage for our results, we characterize the class of linearly valid conditional instrumental sets that yield consistent two-stage least-squares estimators for the target total effect and derive a new asymptotic variance formula for these estimators. Equipped with these results, we provide three graphical tools for selecting more efficient linearly valid conditional instrumental sets: first, a graphical criterion that, for certain pairs of linearly valid conditional instrumental sets, identifies which of the two corresponding estimators has the smaller asymptotic variance second, an algorithm that greedily adds covariates that reduce the asymptotic variance to a given linearly valid conditional instrumental set and, third, a linearly valid conditional instrumental set for which the corresponding estimator has the smallest asymptotic variance that can be ensured with a graphical criterion.

Suggested Citation

  • L Henckel & M Buttenschoen & M H Maathuis, 2024. "Graphical tools for selecting conditional instrumental sets," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 111(3), pages 771-788.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:111:y:2024:i:3:p:771-788.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asad066
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:111:y:2024:i:3:p:771-788.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.