Author
Listed:
- Haibing Zhao
- Huijuan Zhou
Abstract
In the field of multiple hypothesis testing, auxiliary information can be leveraged to enhance the efficiency of test procedures. A common way to make use of auxiliary information is by weighting p-values. However, when the weights are learned from data, controlling the finite-sample false discovery rate becomes challenging, and most existing weighted procedures only guarantee false discovery rate control in an asymptotic limit. In a recent study conducted by Ignatiadis & Huber (2021), a novel τ-censored weighted Benjamini–Hochberg procedure was proposed to control the finite-sample false discovery rate. The authors employed the cross-weighting approach to learn weights for the p-values. This approach randomly splits the data into several folds and constructs a weight for each p-value Pi using the p-values outside the fold containing Pi. Cross-weighting does not exploit the p-value information inside the fold and only balances the weights within each fold, which may result in a loss of power. In this article, we introduce two methods for constructing data-driven weights for τ-censored weighted Benjamini–Hochberg procedures under independence. They provide new insight into masking p-values to prevent overfitting in multiple testing. The first method utilizes a leave-one-out technique, where all but one of the p-values are used to learn a weight for each p-value. This technique masks the information of a p-value in its weight by calculating the infimum of the weight with respect to the p-value. The second method uses partial information from each p-value to construct weights and utilizes the conditional distributions of the null p-values to establish false discovery rate control. Additionally, we propose two methods for estimating the null proportion and demonstrate how to integrate null-proportion adaptivity into the proposed weights to improve power.
Suggested Citation
Haibing Zhao & Huijuan Zhou, 2024.
"τ-censored weighted Benjamini–Hochberg procedures under independence,"
Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 111(2), pages 479-496.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:biomet:v:111:y:2024:i:2:p:479-496.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:111:y:2024:i:2:p:479-496.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.