IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v107yi4p771-790..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On testing marginal versus conditional independence

Author

Listed:
  • F Richard Guo
  • Thomas S Richardson

Abstract

SummaryWe consider testing marginal independence versus conditional independence in a trivariate Gaussian setting. The two models are nonnested, and their intersection is a union of two marginal independences. We consider two sequences of such models, one from each type of independence, that are closest to each other in the Kullback–Leibler sense as they approach the intersection. They become indistinguishable if the signal strength, as measured by the product of two correlation parameters, decreases faster than the standard parametric rate. Under local alternatives at such a rate, we show that the asymptotic distribution of the likelihood ratio depends on where and how the local alternatives approach the intersection. To deal with this nonuniformity, we study a class of envelope distributions by taking pointwise suprema over asymptotic cumulative distribution functions. We show that these envelope distributions are well behaved and lead to model selection procedures with rate-free uniform error guarantees and near-optimal power. To control the error even when the two models are indistinguishable, rather than insist on a dichotomous choice, the proposed procedure will choose either or both models.

Suggested Citation

  • F Richard Guo & Thomas S Richardson, 0. "On testing marginal versus conditional independence," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 107(4), pages 771-790.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:107:y::i:4:p:771-790.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asaa040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:107:y::i:4:p:771-790.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.