IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v35y2024i6p361-370..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association of prey quality with environmental odors in the foraging behavior of Pardosa milvina

Author

Listed:
  • Hailey C Shannon
  • Ann L Rypstra

Abstract

Modulation of predatory behaviors based on prey profitability can improve overall foraging efficiency by allocating energy reserves towards more valuable prey. Should the value of prey vary predictably across the landscape, predators could also benefit from the utilization of environmental cues to inform their foraging decisions. Here, we present data on context-dependent foraging behaviors of the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Spiders underwent testing during which subjects were alternately provided cricket prey coated with either a favorable (sucrose) or unfavorable (quinine) solution. Each prey type was paired with 1 of 2 environmental odors such that one odor was always predictive of unfavorable prey and the other was always predictive of favorable prey. We found that P. milvina reduced their attacks over time while differing significantly in behavior towards the 2 prey types. The rate of nonresponses towards the unfavorable prey increased significantly over time compared to the favorable prey, suggesting that spiders were avoiding the former. Our findings indicate that P. milvina can differentiate between environmental odor cues associated with prey type. Additionally, we report on a novel prey handling behavior where spiders would repeatedly drag unfavorable prey along the arena floor between bouts of cheliceral grooming. We propose this behavior may have served to remove quinine from the prey.

Suggested Citation

  • Hailey C Shannon & Ann L Rypstra, 2024. "Association of prey quality with environmental odors in the foraging behavior of Pardosa milvina," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 35(6), pages 361-370.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:6:p:361-370.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arae079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:6:p:361-370.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.