Author
Listed:
- Sydney K Kochensparger
- Christina J Painting
- Bruno A Buzatto
- Erin L McCullough
Abstract
Competition for mates can drive the evolution of exaggerated weaponry and male dimorphism associated with alternative reproductive tactics. In terrestrial arthropods, male dimorphism is often detected as non-linear allometries, where the scaling relationship between weapon size and body size differs in intercept and/or slope between morphs. Understanding the patterns of non-linear allometries is important as it can provide insights into threshold evolution and the strength of selection experienced by each morph. Numerous studies in male-dimorphic arthropods have reported that allometric slopes of weapons are shallower in large “major” males compared to small “minor” males. Because this pattern is common among beetles that undergo complete metamorphosis (holometabolous), researchers have hypothesized that the slope change reflects resource depletion during pupal development. However, no comprehensive survey has examined the generality of this trend. We systematically searched the literature for reports of weapon allometries in male dimorphic species and conducted a phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis to explore the factors influencing the difference in slopes between morphs. Our search identified 59 effect sizes from 19 studies, 50 species, and 5 orders of terrestrial arthropods. We found strong evidence that metamorphosis type influences the patterns of weapon allometries. Slopes were significantly steeper in minor males compared to major males in holometabolous species, but there was no difference in slopes between morphs in hemimetabolous species (i.e. those that undergo incomplete or no metamorphosis). These results support the hypothesis that holometabolous species face a resource ceiling during pupal development that limits the exaggeration of weapon size.
Suggested Citation
Sydney K Kochensparger & Christina J Painting & Bruno A Buzatto & Erin L McCullough, 2024.
"Are weapon allometries steeper in major or minor males? A meta-analysis,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 35(6), pages 2450-2458.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:6:p:2450-2458.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:6:p:2450-2458.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.