IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v35y2024i4p1415-1419..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative telencephalon size does not affect collective motion in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)

Author

Listed:
  • Annika Boussard
  • Mikaela Ahlkvist
  • Alberto Corral-López
  • Stephanie Fong
  • John Fitzpatrick
  • Niclas Kolm

Abstract

Collective motion is common across all animal taxa, from swarming insects to schools of fish. The collective motion requires intricate behavioral integration among individuals, yet little is known about how evolutionary changes in brain morphology influence the ability for individuals to coordinate behavior in groups. In this study, we utilized guppies that were selectively bred for relative telencephalon size, an aspect of brain morphology that is normally associated with advanced cognitive functions, to examine its role in collective motion using an open-field assay. We analyzed high-resolution tracking data of same-sex shoals consisting of 8 individuals to assess different aspects of collective motion, such as alignment, attraction to nearby shoal members, and swimming speed. Our findings indicate that variation in collective motion in guppy shoals might not be strongly affected by variation in relative telencephalon size. Our study suggests that group dynamics in collectively moving animals are likely not driven by advanced cognitive functions but rather by fundamental cognitive processes stemming from relatively simple rules among neighboring individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Annika Boussard & Mikaela Ahlkvist & Alberto Corral-López & Stephanie Fong & John Fitzpatrick & Niclas Kolm, 2024. "Relative telencephalon size does not affect collective motion in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 35(4), pages 1415-1419.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:4:p:1415-1419.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arae033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:4:p:1415-1419.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.