IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v35y2024i3p211-238..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The matador bug’s elaborate flags deter avian predators

Author

Listed:
  • Juliette J Rubin
  • Jorge L Medina-Madrid
  • Jay J Falk
  • Ummat Somjee

Abstract

Large, conspicuous traits frequently evolve despite increased predator attention, but in some cases, specifically to attract attention. Sexually selected traits provide some of the clearest examples of elaboration, yet natural selection can also be a powerful driver. The matador bug, Anisoscelis alipes (Hemiptera: Coreidae), has large, colorful flags on its hindlegs that, unlike many other coreid species, are not used in reproductive competition. We hypothesized that these flags either 1) warn predators of chemical defense or 2) deflect predatory attack to the removable hindlegs. We pitted matador bugs with or without flags and crickets (Acheta domesticus) with or without bug flags experimentally attached to their legs, against live motmot bird predators (Momotus subrufescens and Electron platyrhynchum). Contrary to the deflection hypothesis, almost none of the predatory strikes were directed at hindleg flags. Instead, we found support for the aposematism hypothesis: matador bug flags reduced attacks on palatable crickets but were unnecessary to prevent predator attacks against matador bugs. Palatability studies with naïve chicks (Gallus gallus) further supported a chemical defense hypothesis. Thus, these elaborate hindleg flags serve an aposematic anti-predator function, but in their absence, birds use alternative cues. These findings add to our understanding of the role of predation in driving the evolution of elaborate morphological structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Juliette J Rubin & Jorge L Medina-Madrid & Jay J Falk & Ummat Somjee, 2024. "The matador bug’s elaborate flags deter avian predators," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 35(3), pages 211-238.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:211-238.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arae019
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:211-238.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.