IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v35y2024i3p183-197..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive flexibility in a generalist raptor: a comparative analysis along an urbanization gradient

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Marina Biondi
  • Aanalía Medina
  • Eugenia Andrea Bonetti
  • Carla Angela Paterlini
  • María Susana Bó

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed the variation in cognitive flexibility in the Chimango Caracara (Milvago chimango), across areas with different levels of urbanization. To assess this, we utilized the reversal learning assay which measures the ability to adapt behavior in response to changes in environmental contingencies. We also investigated the impact of neophobia on this variation. All chimangos studied succeeded in acquiring a color-reward association and reverting this learned association when the contingencies changed. Urban chimangos were faster than their rural and suburban counterparts during the initial discrimination and reversal phases. The reversal phase proved to be the most challenging task. The analysis of the errors made during this phase revealed that acquiring a new association (i.e. regressive errors) was challenging for the individuals studied, in comparison to inhibiting a previously learned one (i.e. perseverative errors). Neophobia was found to be lower in urban individuals compared to suburban and rural raptors. Moreover, neophobia showed a correlation with regressive errors during the reversal phase among rural and suburban chimangos, while no such correlation was observed among city-dwelling chimangos. We suggest that neophobia acted as a regulating factor of cognitive flexibility, mainly for individuals expressing relatively high levels of this personality trait.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Marina Biondi & Aanalía Medina & Eugenia Andrea Bonetti & Carla Angela Paterlini & María Susana Bó, 2024. "Cognitive flexibility in a generalist raptor: a comparative analysis along an urbanization gradient," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 35(3), pages 183-197.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:183-197.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arae025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:183-197.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.