IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v35y2024i1p330-341..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Immune challenge changes social behavior in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)

Author

Listed:
  • Stella A Encel
  • Timothy M Schaerf
  • Ashley J W Ward

Abstract

Increased exposure to pathogens is often considered to be one of the most significant costs of group living. As a result, animals typically avoid close association with individuals who manifest symptoms of disease. The question remains, however, whether avoidance behaviors are mediated by effects relating specifically to the disease itself, or through recognition of more general sickness behaviors that emerge from the activity of the immune system in response to infection. Here we examined the effects of an immune challenge, induced through exposure to bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS), on individual and social behavior in female guppies (Poecilia reticulata). We found that in a binary choice presentation, healthy focal individuals showed a strong preference to associate with stimulus shoals of saline-injected fish rather than stimulus shoals of LPS-injected fish. In a subsequent examination of group-level dynamics, shoals of LPS-injected females were more dispersed than similar shoals comprised of control fish and showed less coherent collective behavior despite the lack of any obvious difference in general activity between LPS and control fish. We discuss these findings in relation to the need for social animals to mitigate the risk of disease that is associated with living in proximity to conspecifics.

Suggested Citation

  • Stella A Encel & Timothy M Schaerf & Ashley J W Ward, 2024. "Immune challenge changes social behavior in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 35(1), pages 330-341.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:330-341.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arad081
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:330-341.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.