Author
Listed:
- Birgit Szabo
- Madeleine L Holmes
- Benjamin J Ashton
- Martin J Whiting
Abstract
Animals employ quantitative abilities to gauge crucial aspects of their environment, such as food or predator density in a given area or the number of eggs in a nest. These quantitative skills hold ecological implications and can impact an animal’s fitness. However, our comprehension of how these abilities intersect with environmental challenges remains limited. We tested for spontaneous quantity discrimination in the sleepy lizard (Tiliqua rugosa), a long-lived species known for forming life-long pair bonds in which pairs come together for the breeding season. We subjected lizards to a Y-maze experiment presenting both discrete (comparisons involving two vs. four, two vs. six, two vs. eight, four vs. six, four vs. eight, and six vs. eight pieces) and equivalent continuous combinations (single pieces differing in size) of pumpkin pieces. Our findings revealed that sleepy lizards exhibited spontaneous quantity discrimination, favoring the larger quantity in three discrete comparisons (eight vs. two, two vs. six, four vs. six) and two continuous comparisons (eight vs. two, eight vs. four). However, low accuracy may be attributable to difficulty in visual acuity exacerbated by difficulty discriminating quantities at small ratios. Furthermore, we found no evidence for a speed-accuracy trade-off in their decision-making process. Our results suggest that sleepy lizards likely employ multiple cues to estimate quantity accurately. Considering these results in the context of previous studies on various lizard species, it becomes apparent that lizards, as a group, offer a valuable model for unraveling the evolution of cognition, given their diverse ecology and sociobiology.
Suggested Citation
Birgit Szabo & Madeleine L Holmes & Benjamin J Ashton & Martin J Whiting, 2024.
"Spontaneous quantity discrimination in the Australian sleepy lizard (Tiliqua rugosa),"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 35(1), pages 214-236.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:214-236.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:214-236.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.