IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v35y2024i1p1280-1286..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A field experiment reveals reciprocal effects of host personality and parasitism in wild lizards

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Payne
  • David L Sinn
  • Orr Spiegel
  • Michael G Gardner
  • Andrew Sih

Abstract

Host behavior and parasite infection reciprocally interact, but this dynamic is rarely studied experimentally in the field with multiple behaviors. We investigated the interplay between parasitism and host behavior via an in situ experimental tick infestation of a wild population of sleepy lizards, Tiliqua rugosa. Using Bayesian models, we assessed the relationship between experimental infestation and lizard aggression and boldness before and after infestation. First, we tested whether lizard aggression and boldness prior to infestation predicted the probability of tick attachment in the infestation experiment. Second, we evaluated whether experimental infestation affected subsequent lizard aggression and boldness. We found that aggression and boldness related interactively with infestation: for unaggressive lizards, higher boldness was associated with reduced experimental infestation success, but the opposite occurred for aggressive individuals. Second, increased tick infestation did not affect post-infestation aggression, but tended to increase boldness. Taken together, these results highlight the potential for feedbacks between parasites and multi-dimensional host behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Payne & David L Sinn & Orr Spiegel & Michael G Gardner & Andrew Sih, 2024. "A field experiment reveals reciprocal effects of host personality and parasitism in wild lizards," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 35(1), pages 1280-1286.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:1280-1286.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arad091
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:1280-1286.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.