IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v34y2023i6p919-929..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female state and condition-dependent chemical signaling revealed by male choice of silk trails

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle Beyer
  • Kardelen Özgün Uludağ
  • Cristina Tuni

Abstract

Male mate choice is predicted in systems with high costs of mating, as for those with male nuptial gifts and/or sexual cannibalism. We ask whether males of the nuptial gift-giving spider Pisaura mirabilis exert preferences for mates varying in their reproductive potential based on chemical information during mate search. Males were presented with binary trails consisting of silk lines and substrate-borne chemicals deposited while females were walking, from females varying in 1) body condition (high vs. low), 2) developmental state (subadult vs. adult), and 3) mating state (unmated vs. mated). If female chemical signaling co-varies with individual state, we expect males to choose trails of females that are 1) in higher body condition, indicating higher fecundity, 2) adults, which can successfully reproduce, and 3) unmated, to avoid sperm competition. We show that female signaling is condition-dependent, with males being more likely to follow trails of higher body condition females, but not dependent on female mating state. Males also tended to prefer trails of adults over subadults. Choice did not depend on male individual body condition. Our findings suggest costs to chemical signaling in nutritionally deprived females, often considered negligible, and their potential as reliable indicators of individual quality. Selection may favor male preferences for more fecund partners given the energetic investment nuptial gifts entail. Nutritional and reproductive benefits of multiple mating to females and high share of paternity for males, may instead select against signaling of female mating state, and/or male discrimination and choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle Beyer & Kardelen Özgün Uludağ & Cristina Tuni, 2023. "Female state and condition-dependent chemical signaling revealed by male choice of silk trails," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(6), pages 919-929.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:34:y:2023:i:6:p:919-929.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arad068
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrea Gonzalez-Karlsson & Yftach Golov & Hadass Steinitz & Aviad Moncaz & Eyal Halon & Rami Horowitz & Inna Goldenberg & Roi Gurka & Alexander Liberzon & Victoria Soroker & Russell Jurenka & Ally R Ha, 2021. "Males perceive honest information from female released sex pheromone in a moth," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1127-1137.
    2. Paolo Giovanni Ghislandi & Michelle Beyer & Patricia Velado & Cristina Tuni, 2017. "Silk wrapping of nuptial gifts aids cheating behaviour in male spiders," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(3), pages 744-749.
    3. Tristram D. Wyatt, 2009. "Fifty years of pheromones," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7227), pages 262-263, January.
    4. Shevy Waner & Uzi Motro & Yael Lubin & Ally R. Harari, 2018. "Male mate choice in a sexually cannibalistic widow spider," Discussion Paper Series dp713, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    5. Cristina Tuni & Reut Berger-Tal, 2012. "Male preference and female cues: males assess female sexual maturity and mating status in a web-building spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 582-587.
    6. Cristina Tuni & Sabrina Weber & Trine Bilde & Gabriele Uhl, 2017. "Male spiders reduce pre- and postmating sexual investment in response to sperm competition risk," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 1030-1036.
    7. Martina Magris & Cristina Tuni & Per Smiseth, 2019. "Enough for all: no mating effort adjustment to varying mate availability in a gift-giving spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(5), pages 1461-1468.
    8. Daniel Heimerl & Pavla Dudová & Karoline Wacker & Elisa Schenkel & Garance Despréaux & Cristina Tuni, 2022. "Adult sex ratio and male body condition affect alternative reproductive tactics in a spider [Sperm storage mediated by cryptic female choice for nuptial gifts]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 271-279.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adrea Gonzalez-Karlsson & Yftach Golov & Hadass Steinitz & Aviad Moncaz & Eyal Halon & Rami Horowitz & Inna Goldenberg & Roi Gurka & Alexander Liberzon & Victoria Soroker & Russell Jurenka & Ally R Ha, 2021. "Males perceive honest information from female released sex pheromone in a moth," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1127-1137.
    2. Maya Bar-Hillel & Cass R. Sunstein, 2019. "Baffling bathrooms: On navigability and choice architecture," Discussion Paper Series dp726, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    3. Lenka Sentenská & Catherine Scott & Pierick Mouginot & Maydianne C B Andrade, 2022. "Risky business: males choose more receptive adults over safer subadults in a cannibalistic spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(4), pages 688-697.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:34:y:2023:i:6:p:919-929.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.