IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i6p1070-1079..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monks relax sibling competition over parental resources in Tibetan populations
[Cooperative breeding in birds: a comparative test of the life history hypothesis]

Author

Listed:
  • Liqiong Zhou
  • Erhao Ge
  • Alberto J C Micheletti
  • Yuan Chen
  • Juan Du
  • Ruth Mace

Abstract

Why parents in some societies induce some of their sons to become religious celibates is an evolutionary puzzle. Some have speculated that this might be associated with brother competition for family resources. However, the behavioral ecology of monks and the possible links with competition between brothers remain unexplored. Here, we use demographic data from Amdo Tibetan agropastoralists in western China to evaluate what factors determine the probability of becoming a monk and explore the possible association between wealth and having a monk brother. We found that boys with at least one older brother are more likely to become celibate monks. Patrilocal heads of household, who inherit parental property, are more likely to be first-born sons, whereas men who marry uxorilocally, that is they move to their wife’s household, are generally second- or later-born sons. Moreover, we find that men with at least one monk brother are wealthier than men who only have non-celibate brothers. Together, these results suggest that sending a son to the monastery is a way for parents to decrease competition between brothers over family resources. Harsh and resource-limited environments, like the one we consider, can lead to the emergence of communal households, including polyandrous families, which used to be common in Tibetan areas. Directing one son to become a religious celibate offers a potentially effective solution to brother competition in our population.

Suggested Citation

  • Liqiong Zhou & Erhao Ge & Alberto J C Micheletti & Yuan Chen & Juan Du & Ruth Mace, 2022. "Monks relax sibling competition over parental resources in Tibetan populations [Cooperative breeding in birds: a comparative test of the life history hypothesis]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(6), pages 1070-1079.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:6:p:1070-1079.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arac059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:6:p:1070-1079.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.