IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i5p912-925..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female blue tits sing frequently: a sex comparison of occurrence, context, and structure of song
[Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits]

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Sierro
  • Selvino R de Kort
  • Katharina Riebel
  • Ian R Hartley

Abstract

In species with mutual mate choice, we should expect adaptive signaling in both sexes. However, the role of female sexual signals is generally understudied. A case in point is female birdsong that has received considerably less attention than male song. This holds even for well-studied species such as the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus), an important model in evolutionary ecology. Although there have been anecdotal reports of female song from three populations, there are no quantitative studies on female song in this species. Here, we report systematic sampling from a population of individually marked blue tits over 3 years, revealing that females sang frequently throughout the sampling period. Notably, daytime singing of females occurred in functionally similar contexts as in males (agonistic, solo song, and alarm contexts) but females had lower song output than males and were not observed singing dawn song, while males showed long singing displays at dawn before copulations take place. Female and male song overlapped substantially in acoustic structure (i.e., same song types or peak frequency) but females had smaller individual song-type repertoires, shorter trills, and lower vocal consistency. Differential selection pressures related to functional differences in male and female song might explain the observed variation in acoustic structure. With the first quantitative study of female song in such a well-studied species, we hope to stimulate further investigations into the functions of female singing, especially in the Northern temperate zones where female song may have been overlooked, not only in this but perhaps in other monomorphic species.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Sierro & Selvino R de Kort & Katharina Riebel & Ian R Hartley, 2022. "Female blue tits sing frequently: a sex comparison of occurrence, context, and structure of song [Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(5), pages 912-925.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:5:p:912-925.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arac044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amy C. Rogers & Naomi E. Langmore & Raoul A. Mulder, 2007. "Function of pair duets in the eastern whipbird: cooperative defense or sexual conflict?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 182-188, January.
    2. László Zsolt Garamszegi & Denitza Zaprianova Pavlova & Marcel Eens & Anders Pape Møller, 2007. "The evolution of song in female birds in Europe," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 86-96, January.
    3. Timothy H. Parker & Iain R. Barr & Simon C. Griffith, 2006. "The blue tit's song is an inconsistent signal of male condition," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(6), pages 1029-1040, November.
    4. J. Jordan Price, 2009. "Evolution and life-history correlates of female song in the New World blackbirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(5), pages 967-977.
    5. Karan J. Odom & Michelle L. Hall & Katharina Riebel & Kevin E. Omland & Naomi E. Langmore, 2014. "Female song is widespread and ancestral in songbirds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-6, May.
    6. Pavel Linhart & Hans Slabbekoorn & Roman Fuchs, 2012. "The communicative significance of song frequency and song length in territorial chiffchaffs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1338-1347.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naomi E Langmore, 2023. "Female song can be over-looked in even the most intensively studied songbirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(1), pages 160-161.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naomi E Langmore, 2023. "Female song can be over-looked in even the most intensively studied songbirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(1), pages 160-161.
    2. Jason T Weir & Trevor D Price, 2019. "Song playbacks demonstrate slower evolution of song discrimination in birds from Amazonia than from temperate North America," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Iris Adam & Katharina Riebel & Per Stål & Neil Wood & Michael J. Previs & Coen P. H. Elemans, 2023. "Daily vocal exercise is necessary for peak performance singing in a songbird," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Karan J Odom & David M Logue & Colin E Studds & Michelle K Monroe & Susanna K Campbell & Kevin E Omland, 2017. "Duetting behavior varies with sex, season, and singing role in a tropical oriole (Icterus icterus)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1256-1265.
    5. Malin Ah-King, 2022. "The history of sexual selection research provides insights as to why females are still understudied," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:5:p:912-925.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.