IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i4p876-883..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multisensory integration facilitates perceptual restoration of an interrupted call in a species of frog

Author

Listed:
  • Bicheng Zhu
  • Yue Yang
  • Ya Zhou
  • Ke Deng
  • Tongliang Wang
  • Jichao Wang
  • Yezhong Tang
  • Michael J Ryan
  • Jianguo Cui

Abstract

Communication signals by both human and non-human animals are often interrupted in nature. One advantage of multimodal cues is to maintain the salience of interrupted signals. We studied a frog that naturally can have silent gaps within its call. Using video/audio-playbacks, we presented females with interrupted mating calls with or without a simultaneous dynamic (i.e., inflating and deflating) vocal sac and tested whether multisensory cues (noise and/or dynamic vocal sac) inserted into the gap can compensate an interrupted call. We found that neither inserting white noise into the silent gap of an interrupted call nor displaying the dynamic vocal sac in that same gap restored the attraction of the call equivalent to that of a complete call. Simultaneously presenting a dynamic vocal sac along with noise in the gap, however, compensated the interrupted call, making it as attractive as a complete call. Our results demonstrate that the dynamic visual sac compensates for noise interference. Such novel multisensory integration suggests that multimodal cues can provide insurance against imperfect sender coding in a noisy environment, and the communication benefits to the receiver from multisensory integration may be an important selective force favoring multimodal signal evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Bicheng Zhu & Yue Yang & Ya Zhou & Ke Deng & Tongliang Wang & Jichao Wang & Yezhong Tang & Michael J Ryan & Jianguo Cui, 2022. "Multisensory integration facilitates perceptual restoration of an interrupted call in a species of frog," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(4), pages 876-883.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:4:p:876-883.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arac053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:4:p:876-883.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.