IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i4p789-797..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchy of fear: experimentally testing ungulate reactions to lion, African wild dog and cheetah

Author

Listed:
  • Noa L A Rigoudy
  • Michael Clinchy
  • Mike J S Peel
  • Sarah Huebner
  • Craig Packer
  • Liana Y Zanette

Abstract

Experiments have begun demonstrating that the fear (antipredator behavioral responses) large carnivores inspire in ungulates can shape ecosystem structure and function. Most such experiments have focused on the impacts of either just one large carnivore, or all as a whole, rather than the different impacts different large carnivores may have in intact multi-predator-prey systems. Experimentally testing the relative fearfulness ungulates demonstrate toward different large carnivores is a necessary first step in addressing these likely differing impacts. We tested the fearfulness ungulates demonstrated to playbacks of lion (Panthera leo), African wild dog (Lycaon pictus), cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) or non-predator control (bird) vocalizations, in Greater Kruger National Park, South Africa. Ungulates ran most to lions, then wild dogs, and then cheetahs, demonstrating a very clear hierarchy of fear. Those that did not run looked toward the sound more on hearing large carnivores than controls, looking most on hearing lions. Notably, prey species-specific population level kill rates by each predator did not predict the patterns observed. Our results demonstrate that different large carnivores inspire different levels of fear in their ungulate prey, pointing to differing community-level impacts, which we discuss in relation to the ongoing worldwide decline and loss of large carnivores.

Suggested Citation

  • Noa L A Rigoudy & Michael Clinchy & Mike J S Peel & Sarah Huebner & Craig Packer & Liana Y Zanette, 2022. "Hierarchy of fear: experimentally testing ungulate reactions to lion, African wild dog and cheetah," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(4), pages 789-797.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:4:p:789-797.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arac041
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:4:p:789-797.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.