IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i3p592-605..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breeding site fidelity is lower in polygamous shorebirds and male-biased in monogamous species

Author

Listed:
  • Eunbi Kwon
  • 2Mihai Valcu
  • Margherita Cragnolini
  • Martin Bulla
  • Bruce Lyon
  • Bart Kempenaers

Abstract

Sex-bias in breeding dispersal is considered the norm in many taxa, and the magnitude and direction of such sex-bias is expected to correlate with the social mating system. We used local return rates in shorebirds as an index of breeding site fidelity, and hence as an estimate of the propensity for breeding dispersal, and tested whether variation in site fidelity and in sex-bias in site fidelity relates to the mating system. Among 111 populations of 49 species, annual return rates to a breeding site varied between 0% and 100%. After controlling for body size (linked to survival) and other confounding factors, monogamous species showed higher breeding site fidelity compared with polyandrous and polygynous species. Overall, there was a strong male bias in return rates, but the sex-bias in return rate was independent of the mating system and did not covary with the extent of sexual size dimorphism. Our results bolster earlier findings that the sex-biased dispersal is weakly linked to the mating system in birds. Instead, our results show that return rates are strongly correlated with the mating system in shorebirds regardless of sex. This suggests that breeding site fidelity may be linked to mate fidelity, which is only important in the monogamous, biparentally incubating species, or that the same drivers influence both the mating system and site fidelity. The strong connection between site fidelity and the mating system suggests that variation in site fidelity may have played a role in the coevolution of the mating system, parental care, and migration strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Eunbi Kwon & 2Mihai Valcu & Margherita Cragnolini & Martin Bulla & Bruce Lyon & Bart Kempenaers, 2022. "Breeding site fidelity is lower in polygamous shorebirds and male-biased in monogamous species," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(3), pages 592-605.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:3:p:592-605.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arac014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bart Kempenaers & Mihai Valcu, 2017. "Breeding site sampling across the Arctic by individual males of a polygynous shorebird," Nature, Nature, vol. 541(7638), pages 528-531, January.
    2. Anna M.F. Harts & Kim Jaatinen & Hanna Kokko, 2016. "Evolution of natal and breeding dispersal: when is a territory an asset worth protecting?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(1), pages 287-294.
    3. James Dale & Cody J. Dey & Kaspar Delhey & Bart Kempenaers & Mihai Valcu, 2015. "The effects of life history and sexual selection on male and female plumage colouration," Nature, Nature, vol. 527(7578), pages 367-370, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Nolazco & Kaspar Delhey & Shinichi Nakagawa & Anne Peters, 2022. "Ornaments are equally informative in male and female birds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Daiping Wang & Wenyuan Zhang & Shuai Yang & Xiang-Yi Li Richter, 2023. "Sex differences in avian parental care patterns vary across the breeding cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Yichen He & Zoë K. Varley & Lara O. Nouri & Christopher J. A. Moody & Michael D. Jardine & Steve Maddock & Gavin H. Thomas & Christopher R. Cooney, 2022. "Deep learning image segmentation reveals patterns of UV reflectance evolution in passerine birds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Erik D Enbody & Jordan Boersma & Hubert Schwabl & Jordan Karubian, 2018. "Female ornamentation is associated with elevated aggression and testosterone in a tropical songbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1056-1066.
    5. Bettina Almasi & Carolina Massa & Lukas Jenni & Alexandre Roulin, 2021. "Exogenous corticosterone and melanin-based coloration explain variation in juvenile dispersal behaviour in the barn owl (Tyto alba)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Samuel P Caro & Léo Pierre & Matthieu Bergès & Raldi Bakker & Claire Doutrelant & Francesco Bonadonna, 2021. "Mutual mate preferences and assortative mating in relation to a carotenoid-based color trait in blue tits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1171-1182.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:3:p:592-605.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.