IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i1p37-46..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zebra finch song is a very short-range signal in the wild: evidence from an integrated approach
[Song and aggressive signaling in Bachman’s Sparrow]

Author

Listed:
  • Hugo Loning
  • Simon C Griffith
  • Marc Naguib

Abstract

Birdsong is typically seen as a long-range signal functioning in mate attraction and territory defense. Among birds, the zebra finch is the prime model organism in bioacoustics, yet almost exclusively studied in the lab. In the wild, however, zebra finch song differs strikingly from songbirds commonly studied in the wild as zebra finch males sing most after mating and in the absence of territoriality. Using data from the wild, we here provide an ecological context for a wealth of laboratory studies. By integrating calibrated sound recordings, sound transmission experiments and social ecology of zebra finches in the wild with insights from hearing physiology we show that wild zebra finch song is a very short-range signal with an audible range of about nine meters and that even the louder distance calls do not carry much farther (up to about fourteen meters). These integrated findings provide an ecological context for the interpretation of laboratory studies of this species and indicate that the vocal communication distance of the main laboratory species for avian acoustics contrasts strikingly with songbirds that use their song as a long-range advertisement signal.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugo Loning & Simon C Griffith & Marc Naguib, 2022. "Zebra finch song is a very short-range signal in the wild: evidence from an integrated approach [Song and aggressive signaling in Bachman’s Sparrow]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 37-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:37-46.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arab107
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nina Kniel & Clarissa Dürler & Ines Hecht & Veronika Heinbach & Lilia Zimmermann & Klaudia Witte, 2015. "Novel mate preference through mate-choice copying in zebra finches: sexes differ," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 647-655.
    2. Ofer Tchernichovski & Sophie Eisenberg-Edidin & Erich D. Jarvis, 2021. "Balanced imitation sustains song culture in zebra finches," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. J. Albert C. Uy & John A. Endler, 2004. "Modification of the visual background increases the conspicuousness of golden-collared manakin displays," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(6), pages 1003-1010, November.
    4. Marc Naguib & Rouven Schmidt & Philipp Sprau & Tobias Roth & Cornelia Flörcke & Valentin Amrhein, 2008. "The ecology of vocal signaling: male spacing and communication distance of different song traits in nightingales," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(5), pages 1034-1040.
    5. Philipp Sprau & Tobias Roth & Marc Naguib & Valentin Amrhein, 2012. "Communication in the Third Dimension: Song Perch Height of Rivals Affects Singing Response in Nightingales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-6, March.
    6. Solveig C Mouterde & Frédéric E Theunissen & Julie E Elie & Clémentine Vignal & Nicolas Mathevon, 2014. "Acoustic Communication and Sound Degradation: How Do the Individual Signatures of Male and Female Zebra Finch Calls Transmit over Distance?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philipp Sprau & Tobias Roth & Marc Naguib & Valentin Amrhein, 2012. "Communication in the Third Dimension: Song Perch Height of Rivals Affects Singing Response in Nightingales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-6, March.
    2. Tim Sainburg & Marvin Thielk & Timothy Q Gentner, 2020. "Finding, visualizing, and quantifying latent structure across diverse animal vocal repertoires," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-48, October.
    3. César Cestari & Bette A Loiselle & Marco Aurélio Pizo, 2016. "Trade-Offs in Male Display Activity with Lek Size," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Sabine Nöbel & Etienne Danchin & Guillaume Isabel, 2018. "Mate-copying for a costly variant in Drosophila melanogaster females," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1150-1156.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:37-46.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.