IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i1p213-221..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Condition- and context-dependent alternative reproductive tactic in Drosophila prolongata
[Contribution of larval nutrition to adult reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster]

Author

Listed:
  • Jhoniel Perdigón Ferreira
  • Stefan Lüpold

Abstract

Species with intense male–male competition for access to females often show alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs) where males of lower competitive ability adopt a sneaky behavior to gain access to mates. These ARTs are usually associated with intrasexual dimorphisms, in that males with distinct morphologies show different tactics. In some cases, however, males adopt different tactics without being dimorphic. Male Drosophila prolongata exhibit continuous variation in body size and shape, with enlarged forelegs that they use in male-male contests and in courtship, including stimulation of the female’s abdomen. During this “leg vibration,” however, nearby males can intercept the courted female and mate without their own courtship. Here, we studied the causes and consequences of these different mating tactics in competitive mating trials between males varying in their size and shape. We found that male mating tactics were condition-dependent. Whereas large, high-condition males were more likely to show leg vibration in their courtship, smaller, lower-condition males were more likely to intercept. However, the number of offspring produced was independent of male condition and reproductive tactic. We discuss possible scenarios for the evolution and maintenance of the ARTs and some future directions for the study of ARTs in this species and in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Jhoniel Perdigón Ferreira & Stefan Lüpold, 2022. "Condition- and context-dependent alternative reproductive tactic in Drosophila prolongata [Contribution of larval nutrition to adult reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 213-221.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:213-221.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arab127
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:213-221.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.