IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i1p137-146..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social environment shapes female settlement decisions in a solitary carnivore
[Social barriers in ecological landscapes: the social resistance hypothesis]

Author

Listed:
  • J E Hansen
  • A G Hertel
  • S C Frank
  • J Kindberg
  • A Zedrosser

Abstract

How and where a female selects an area to settle and breed is of central importance in dispersal and population ecology as it governs range expansion and gene flow. Social structure and organization have been shown to influence settlement decisions, but its importance in the settlement of large, solitary mammals is largely unknown. We investigate how the identity of overlapping conspecifics on the landscape, acquired during the maternal care period, influences the selection of settlement home ranges in a non-territorial, solitary mammal using location data of 56 female brown bears (Ursus arctos). We used a resource selection function to determine whether females’ settlement behavior was influenced by the presence of their mother, related females, familiar females, and female population density. Hunting may remove mothers and result in socio-spatial changes before settlement. We compared overlap between settling females and their mother’s concurrent or most recent home ranges to examine the settling female’s response to the absence or presence of her mother on the landscape. We found that females selected settlement home ranges that overlapped their mother’s home range, familiar females, that is, those they had previously overlapped with, and areas with higher density than their natal ranges. However, they did not select areas overlapping related females. We also found that when mothers were removed from the landscape, female offspring selected settlement home ranges with greater overlap of their mother’s range, compared with mothers who were alive. Our results suggest that females are acquiring and using information about their social environment when making settlement decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • J E Hansen & A G Hertel & S C Frank & J Kindberg & A Zedrosser, 2022. "Social environment shapes female settlement decisions in a solitary carnivore [Social barriers in ecological landscapes: the social resistance hypothesis]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 137-146.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:137-146.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arab118
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Teague O’Mara & Dina K.N. Dechmann & Rachel A. Page, 2014. "Frugivorous bats evaluate the quality of social information when choosing novel foods," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1233-1239.
    2. Joanie Van de Walle & Gabriel Pigeon & Andreas Zedrosser & Jon E. Swenson & Fanie Pelletier, 2018. "Hunting regulation favors slow life histories in a large carnivore," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Elodie Vercken & Barry Sinervo & Jean Clobert, 2012. "The importance of a good neighborhood: dispersal decisions in juvenile common lizards are based on social environment," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1059-1067.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William W Deacy & William B Leacock & Eric J Ward & Jonathan B Armstrong, 2019. "Aerial surveys cause large but ephemeral decreases in bear presence at salmon streams in Kodiak, Alaska," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:137-146.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.