IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v32y2021i4p646-656..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic inference of the mating system of free-ranging domestic dogs

Author

Listed:
  • Eugenia Natoli
  • Roberto Bonanni
  • Simona Cafazzo
  • Daniel S Mills
  • Dominique Pontier
  • Małgorzata Pilot
  • John Quinn

Abstract

Domestication has greatly changed the social and reproductive behavior of dogs relative to that of wild members of the genus Canis, which typically exhibit social monogamy and extended parental care. Unlike a typical gray wolf pack that consists of a single breeding pair and their offspring from multiple seasons, a group of free-ranging dogs (FRDs) can include multiple breeding individuals of both sexes. To understand the consequences of this shift in reproductive behavior, we reconstructed the genetic pedigree of an FRD population and assessed the kinship patterns in social groups, based on genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes. Consistent with behavioral observations, the mating system of the study population was characterized by polygynandry. Instead of the discreet family units observed in wolves, FRDs were linked by a network of kinship relationships that spread across packs. However, we also observed reproduction of the same male–female pairs in multiple seasons, retention of adult offspring in natal packs, and dispersal between neighboring packs—patterns in common with wolves. Although monogamy is the predominant mating system in wolves, polygyny and polyandry are occasionally observed in response to increased food availability. Thus, polygynandry of domestic dogs was likely influenced by the shift in ecological niche from an apex predator to a human commensal.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugenia Natoli & Roberto Bonanni & Simona Cafazzo & Daniel S Mills & Dominique Pontier & Małgorzata Pilot & John Quinn, 2021. "Genetic inference of the mating system of free-ranging domestic dogs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(4), pages 646-656.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:32:y:2021:i:4:p:646-656.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arab011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:32:y:2021:i:4:p:646-656.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.