IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v32y2021i3p508-517..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dyadic leader–follower dynamics change across situations in captive house sparrows

Author

Listed:
  • Beniamino Tuliozi
  • Ettore Camerlenghi
  • Matteo Griggio
  • Noa Pinter-Wollman

Abstract

Individuals can behave as either leaders or followers in many taxa of collectively moving animals. Leaders initiate movements and may incur predation risks, while followers are thought to be more risk-averse. As a group encounters different challenges and ecological situations, individuals in the group may change their social role. We investigated leader and follower roles using dyads of captive house sparrow (Passer domesticus) during both exploration of a novel environment and a simulation of predator attack. During the exploration of a novel environment, individuals behaved consistently either as leaders or followers. However, in the simulated attack tests, individuals in the dyads switched their roles, with “followers” leading the escape flights and “leaders” following them. Our study provides evidence of 1) consistent differences between individuals in behavior during social escape and 2) a relationship between social roles across different situations. We suggest that such relationship hinges on individual risk-taking tendencies, which manifest through different social roles across different ecological situations. We further speculate that risk-taking individuals might gain benefits by following risk-averse individuals during an escape flight.

Suggested Citation

  • Beniamino Tuliozi & Ettore Camerlenghi & Matteo Griggio & Noa Pinter-Wollman, 2021. "Dyadic leader–follower dynamics change across situations in captive house sparrows," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(3), pages 508-517.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:32:y:2021:i:3:p:508-517.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araa148
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:32:y:2021:i:3:p:508-517.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.