IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v32y2021i2p257-264..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foraging aggressiveness determines trophic niche in a generalist biological control species
[Weed species, not mulching, affect web-building spiders and their prey in organic fruit orchards in South Africa]

Author

Listed:
  • Radek Michalko
  • Alastair T Gibbons
  • Sara L Goodacre
  • Stano Pekár
  • Noa Pinter-Wollman

Abstract

There is a growing evidence that consistent interindividual differences in behavior, that is, behavioral types, can play an important role in key ecological processes such as predator–prey interactions, which in turn can have direct implications on biological control. Behavioral types of generalist predators may affect these interactions through individual differences in predators’ prey preferences and the breadth of predators’ trophic niches. This study examined how the multivariate nature of behavior, namely foraging aggressiveness, activity level, and risk-taking behavior, determines prey selection and trophic niche of the generalist agrobiont spider Philodromus cespitum. In laboratory experiments, we determined the repeatability of these behaviors and the preference between crickets, moths, fruit flies, and collembolans. We found that all three behaviors were moderately to strongly repeatable but there were no correlations between them, thus they did not form a behavioral syndrome. Only foraging aggressiveness influenced the prey selection of philodromid spiders and the more aggressive individuals had wider trophic niches because they incorporated prey that were more difficult to capture in their diet. In addition, more aggressive individuals killed a greater quantity of particular prey types while other prey types were killed at a similar rate by both aggressive and nonaggressive individuals. The differences in philodromids’ foraging aggressiveness, therefore, affected not only the overall prey density but also resulted in different prey community composition. As pest density and composition can both affect crop performance, further research needs to investigate how the interindividual behavioral differences of generalist natural enemies cascade down on the crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Radek Michalko & Alastair T Gibbons & Sara L Goodacre & Stano Pekár & Noa Pinter-Wollman, 2021. "Foraging aggressiveness determines trophic niche in a generalist biological control species [Weed species, not mulching, affect web-building spiders and their prey in organic fruit orchards in Sout," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(2), pages 257-264.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:32:y:2021:i:2:p:257-264.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araa123
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:32:y:2021:i:2:p:257-264.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.