IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v31y2020i6p1353-1360..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An experimental test to separate the effects of male age and mating history on female mate choice

Author

Listed:
  • Upama Aich
  • Timothee Bonnet
  • Rebecca J Fox
  • Michael D Jennions
  • Ulrika Candolin

Abstract

Should females prefer older males as mates? Male survival to old age might indicate the presence of fitness-enhancing genes that increase offspring fitness. However, many correlational studies show that mating with older males can lower female fecundity and even reduce offspring fitness due to epigenetic or germline mutation effects. One problem in quantifying female choice based on male age is that age is usually confounded with mating history. This begs a question: Do females choose males based on their age or their mating history? The answer requires an experimental approach, but few such studies exist. Here, we test if experimentally induced variation in the mating history of old and young males (12-week difference in postmaturity age) affects female choice in the eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki). To vary mating history, adult males were either allowed to freely mate with females for 3 weeks or they only had visual contact with females. Immediately thereafter, we ran four-choice mating trials, using association time, to test the effects of male age and mating history (2 × 2 design) on male attractiveness. Females did not show a clear preference for males based on either characteristic. This was not due to a lack of female choice: females spent significantly more time with larger males. In addition, female choice was significantly repeatable across four trials: twice as a virgin and twice as a nonvirgin. Finally, female mating status (virgin or nonvirgin) did not affect her choice of mate, although virgin females spent significantly more time associating with test males.

Suggested Citation

  • Upama Aich & Timothee Bonnet & Rebecca J Fox & Michael D Jennions & Ulrika Candolin, 2020. "An experimental test to separate the effects of male age and mating history on female mate choice," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(6), pages 1353-1360.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:6:p:1353-1360.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araa092
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Upama Aich & Bob B M Wong, 2023. "The complex interplay between male and female mating history: a comment on Richardson and Zuk," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(2), pages 184-185.
    2. Lutz Fromhage & Michael D Jennions, 2023. "Assumptions, models and data: a comment on Richardson and Zuk," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(2), pages 185-186.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:6:p:1353-1360.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.