IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v31y2020i5p1218-1223..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost of an elaborate trait: a trade-off between attracting females and maintaining a clean ornament

Author

Listed:
  • Erin L McCullough
  • Chun-Chia Chou
  • Patricia R Y Backwell
  • Per Smiseth

Abstract

Many sexually selected ornaments and weapons are elaborations of an animal’s outer body surface, including long feathers, colorful skin, and rigid outgrowths. The time and energy required to keep these traits clean, attractive, and in good condition for signaling may represent an important but understudied cost of bearing a sexually selected trait. Male fiddler crabs possess an enlarged and brightly colored claw that is used both as a weapon to fight with rival males and also as an ornament to court females. Here, we demonstrate that males benefit from grooming because females prefer males with clean claws over dirty claws but also that the time spent grooming detracts from the amount of time available for courting females. Males, therefore, face a temporal trade-off between attracting the attention of females and maintaining a clean claw. Our study provides rare evidence of the importance of grooming for mediating sexual interactions in an invertebrate, indicating that sexual selection has likely shaped the evolution of self-maintenance behaviors across a broad range of taxa.

Suggested Citation

  • Erin L McCullough & Chun-Chia Chou & Patricia R Y Backwell & Per Smiseth, 2020. "Cost of an elaborate trait: a trade-off between attracting females and maintaining a clean ornament," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(5), pages 1218-1223.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:5:p:1218-1223.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araa072
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:5:p:1218-1223.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.