IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v31y2020i5p1172-1179..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polyandry and paternity affect disease resistance in eusocial wasps

Author

Listed:
  • Tatsuya Saga
  • Masaki Okuno
  • Kevin J Loope
  • Koji Tsuchida
  • Kako Ohbayashi
  • Masakazu Shimada
  • Yasukazu Okada
  • Marie Herberstein

Abstract

Polyandry (multiple mating by females) is a central challenge for understanding the evolution of eusociality. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain its observed benefits in eusocial Hymenoptera, one of which, the parasite–pathogen hypothesis (PPH), posits that high genotypic variance among workers for disease resistance prevents catastrophic colony collapse. We tested the PPH in the polyandrous wasp Vespula shidai. We infected isolated workers with the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana and quantified their survival in the laboratory. Additionally, we conducted a paternity analysis of the workers using nine microsatellite loci to investigate the relationship between survival and the matriline and patriline membership of the workers. As predicted by the PPH, nestmate workers of different patrilines showed differential resistance to B. bassiana. We also demonstrated variation in virulence among strains of B. bassiana. Our results are the first to directly support the PPH in eusocial wasps and suggest that similar evolutionary pressures drove the convergent origin and maintenance of polyandry in ants, bees, and wasps.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatsuya Saga & Masaki Okuno & Kevin J Loope & Koji Tsuchida & Kako Ohbayashi & Masakazu Shimada & Yasukazu Okada & Marie Herberstein, 2020. "Polyandry and paternity affect disease resistance in eusocial wasps," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(5), pages 1172-1179.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:5:p:1172-1179.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araa062
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:5:p:1172-1179.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.