IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v31y2020i3p739-749..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the use of private versus social information in oviposition site choice decisions by Drosophila melanogaster females

Author

Listed:
  • Heather L Malek
  • Tristan A F Long
  • Luke HolmanEditor

Abstract

Individuals are faced with decisions throughout their lifetimes, and the choices they make often have important consequences toward their fitness. Being able to discern which available option is best to pursue often incurs sampling costs, which may be largely avoided by copying the behavior and decisions of others. Although social learning and copying behaviors are widespread, much remains unknown about how effective and adaptive copying behavior is, as well as the factors that underlie its expression. Recently, it has been suggested that since female fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) appear to rely heavily on public information when selecting oviposition sites, they are a promising model system for researching patch-choice copying, and more generally, the mechanisms that control decision making. Here, we set out to determine how well female distinguish between socially produced cues, and whether females are using “relevant” signals when choosing an oviposition site. We found that females showed a strong preference for ovipositing on media patches that had been previously occupied by ovipositing females of the same species and diet over other female outgroups. However, in a separate assay, we observed that females favored ovipositing on media patches that previously housed virgin males over those exhibiting alternative conspecific signals. Our results confirm that females use cues left behind by other flies when choosing between potential oviposition sites, though their prioritization of these signals raises serious questions as to whether fruit flies are employing copying behavior, or are instead responding to signals that may not be of relevance to oviposition site suitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Heather L Malek & Tristan A F Long & Luke HolmanEditor, 2020. "On the use of private versus social information in oviposition site choice decisions by Drosophila melanogaster females," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(3), pages 739-749.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:739-749.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araa021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emily R Churchill & Calvin Dytham & Jon R Bridle & Michael D F Thom, 2021. "Social and physical environment independently affect oviposition decisions in Drosophila," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1391-1399.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:739-749.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.