IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v31y2020i3p627-632..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physical and social cues shape nest-site preference and prey capture behavior in social spiders

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriella M Najm
  • Angelika Pe
  • Jonathan N Pruitt
  • Noa Pinter-Wollman
  • Marie Herberstein

Abstract

Animals often face conflicting demands when making movement decisions. To examine the decision process of social animals, we evaluated nest-site preferences of the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola. Colonies engage in collective web building, constructing 3D nests and 2D capture webs on trees and fences. We examined how individuals and groups decide where to construct a nest based on habitat structure and conspecific presence. Individuals had a strong preference for 3D substrates and conspecific presence. Groups were then provided with conflicting options of 3D substrates versus 2D substrates with a conspecific. Groups preferred the 3D structures without presettled conspecifics over a 2D substrate with conspecifics. When a group fragmented and individuals settled on both substrates, the minority group eventually joined the majority. Before rejoining, the collective prey capture behavior of divided groups improved with the size of the majority fragment. The costs of slow responses to prey for split groups and weak conspecific attraction may explain why dispersal is rare in these spiders.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriella M Najm & Angelika Pe & Jonathan N Pruitt & Noa Pinter-Wollman & Marie Herberstein, 2020. "Physical and social cues shape nest-site preference and prey capture behavior in social spiders," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(3), pages 627-632.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:627-632.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/araa003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:627-632.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.