IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v31y2020i1p97-106..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual foraging variation drives social organization in bottlenose dolphins

Author

Listed:
  • Séverine Methion
  • Bruno Díaz López
  • Amanda Ridley

Abstract

Identifying foraging variation within a population and assessing its relationship with social structure is essential to increase knowledge about the evolution of social systems. Here, we investigated individual foraging variation in bottlenose dolphins and its potential influence on their social organization. We used generalized affiliation indices and applied social network analysis to data collected over four consecutive years of research in a coastal area subject to significant use and pressure by humans. Our findings revealed variation in foraging behavior among individual bottlenose dolphins, which in turn shapes their social organization. Our results indicated that individuals that frequently foraged within human-altered areas (i.e., shellfish farms) exhibited weaker Strength, Reach, and Affinity compared to others. These bottlenose dolphins profit from a reliable and easily located food source, which may increase their energy intake and interindividual competition. In contrast, individuals that foraged less frequently within the shellfish farms occupied a central position within the network and exhibited strong associations. These individuals may benefit from increased cooperation and reduced intragroup competition, thus increasing learning and information sharing, as they may face a patchy and irregular distribution of prey. We also demonstrated that bottlenose dolphins preferred to affiliate with other individuals with similar foraging strategies (i.e., homophily), which could promote, through time, a segregation of the population into behaviorally distinct groups. These findings provide valuable insight into the evolution of bottlenose dolphin social systems and their response to human-induced changes in the marine environment. Lay Summary We identified variation in foraging behavior among individual bottlenose dolphins, which in turn shapes their social organization. We reveal that bottlenose dolphins that frequently foraged within human-altered areas (i.e., shellfish farms) exhibit weaker associations compared to others, as the reliable and easily located food source may have made less necessary for dolphins to cooperate with conspecifics. Furthermore, our results suggest that bottlenose dolphins preferred to affiliate with other individuals with similar foraging strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Séverine Methion & Bruno Díaz López & Amanda Ridley, 2020. "Individual foraging variation drives social organization in bottlenose dolphins," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(1), pages 97-106.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:97-106.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz160
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:97-106.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.