IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v31y2020i1p43-53..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What makes motion dazzle markings effective against predation?

Author

Listed:
  • Ullasa Kodandaramaiah
  • Shuaib Palathingal
  • Gayathri Bindu Kurup
  • Gopal Murali
  • Per Smiseth

Abstract

Motion dazzle markings comprise patterns such as stripes and zig-zags that are postulated to protect moving prey by making predators misjudge the prey’s speed or trajectory. Recent experiments have provided conflicting results on their effect on speed perception and attack success. We focus on motion dazzle stripes and investigate the influence of four parameters—stripe orientation, stripe contrast, target size, and target speed—on perceived speed and attack success using a common experimental paradigm involving human “predators” attacking virtual moving targets on a computer touchscreen. We found that high-contrast stripes running parallel or perpendicular to the direction of motion reduce attack success compared to conspicuous uniform targets. Surprisingly, parallel stripes induced underestimation of speed, while perpendicular stripes induced overestimation of speed in relation to uniform black, suggesting that misjudgment of speed per se is sufficient to reduce attack accuracy. Across all the experiments, we found some support for parallel stripes inducing underestimation of target speed but these stripes reduced attack success only when targets were small, moved at an intermediate speed, and had high internal contrast. We suggest that prey features (e.g., size or speed) are an important determinant of capture success and that distortion of speed perception by a color pattern does not necessarily translate to reduced capture success of the prey. Overall, our results support the idea that striped patterns in prey animals can reduce capture in motion but are effective under a limited set of conditions. Lay Summary We show that target and color pattern characteristics are important determinants for the effectiveness of motion dazzle colorations—repetitive color patterns that are proposed to reduce predatory attacks when the prey is moving. Experimental results from previous studies have been highly inconsistent, often strongly conflicting with each other, one reason for this being differences in the experimental protocols followed. We conduct a large set of experiments to understand the important determinants of the effectiveness of motion dazzle colorations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ullasa Kodandaramaiah & Shuaib Palathingal & Gayathri Bindu Kurup & Gopal Murali & Per Smiseth, 2020. "What makes motion dazzle markings effective against predation?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(1), pages 43-53.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:43-53.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz154
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patricia Henríquez-Piskulich & Devi Stuart-Fox & Mark Elgar & Ivan Marusic & Amanda M Franklin, 2023. "Dazzled by shine: gloss as an antipredator strategy in fast moving prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(5), pages 862-871.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:43-53.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.