IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v31y2020i1p32-42..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Game of webs: species and web structure influence contest outcome in black widow spiders

Author

Listed:
  • Cameron Jones
  • Lea Pollack
  • Nicholas DiRienzo
  • Andrea Griffin

Abstract

Population-level trait variation within species plays an often-overlooked role in interspecific interactions. In this study, we compared among-individual variation in web phenotype and foraging behavior between native black widows (Latrodectus hesperus) and invasive brown widows (Latrodectus geometricus). We staged repeated contests whereby native widows defended their webs against intruders of both species to 1) investigate how trait variation mediates web contest outcome among native widows and 2) see whether widow behavior differs in response to an invasive spider. In only one trait, the average number of foraging lines, did black widows differ from brown widows. Black widow residents that built more structural lines were more likely to successfully defend their webs from conspecific intruders (i.e., be the sole spider remaining on the web postinteraction). This association between web structure and contest outcome did not exist in trials between black widows and invasive brown widows; however, in interspecific interactions, these same residents were more likely to have intruders remain on the web rather than drive them away. Surprisingly, brown widows did not usurp black widows. Brown widows were never observed signaling, yet black widow residents signaled equally to intruders of both species. Our results suggest that among-individual variation among native species can influence the response toward invasive competitors and outcome of these interactions. Lay Summary When native species compete with invasive animals, certain individuals may behave in a way that is inappropriate. In native black widows, females that construct webs with more defensive silk lines, relative to foraging silk lines, are better at defending their webs from conspecific intruders yet perform worse when defending against invasive brown widow intruders. Signaling toward web intruders safely resolves contests among natives but does nothing in contests with invasive widows.

Suggested Citation

  • Cameron Jones & Lea Pollack & Nicholas DiRienzo & Andrea Griffin, 2020. "Game of webs: species and web structure influence contest outcome in black widow spiders," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(1), pages 32-42.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:32-42.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz153
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:32-42.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.