IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v31y2020i1p123-131..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does city life reduce neophobia? A study on wild black-capped chickadees

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Jarjour
  • Julian C Evans
  • Mélanie Routh
  • Julie Morand-Ferron
  • Ulrika Candolin

Abstract

As human populations increase and city borders grow, many animals have to modify foraging behaviors in order to exploit evolutionarily novel urban food sources that could aid their survival. Neophobia, the fear of novelty, can lead to missed opportunities in these cases. Here, we studied the novelty response of wild animals in ecologically relevant conditions while controlling for individual characteristics and potential differences in foraging group size. We predicted that urban black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) would be more likely to initially contact novelty than rural chickadees and that subordinates and juveniles would be more likely to first contact novelty than dominants and adults, respectively. We ran replicated experiments using three novelty types (object, color, or food) on six sites, during which we registered feeder choice of 71 tagged individuals. We found that urban chickadees showed less neophobia than their rural counterparts, the latter having a higher probability of initially contacting the familiar feeder before approaching the novel feeder. There was no significant effect of an individual’s dominance, age, or sex on its first choice of feeder, nor was there any effect of novelty type. Overall, our results suggest that urban chickadees exhibit less neophobia than their rural counterparts because they have generally learned to tolerate novelty in their habitat, they have adapted to live in an environment that rewards low neophobia, and/or they are less reluctant to use feeders at new locations. Lay Summary Black-capped chickadees living in the city are less wary of new items that appear in their home range than forest-dwelling chickadees. Their response to novelty is not affected by how dominant they are, whether they are an older or younger individual, or whether they are male or female. Even the size of their foraging group or the nature of the new item does not influence the amount of wariness they exhibit.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Jarjour & Julian C Evans & Mélanie Routh & Julie Morand-Ferron & Ulrika Candolin, 2020. "Does city life reduce neophobia? A study on wild black-capped chickadees," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(1), pages 123-131.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:123-131.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz167
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José M. Gil-Sánchez & Natividad Aguilera-Alcalá & Marcos Moleón & Esther Sebastián-González & Antoni Margalida & Zebensui Morales-Reyes & Carlos J. Durá-Alemañ & Pilar Oliva-Vidal & Juan M. Pérez-Garc, 2021. "Biases in the Detection of Intentionally Poisoned Animals: Public Health and Conservation Implications from a Field Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:123-131.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.