IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i6p1522-1529..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial selection on walking distance suggests a mobility-sperm competitiveness trade-off

Author

Listed:
  • Kentarou Matsumura
  • C Ruth Archer
  • David J Hosken
  • Takahisa Miyatake
  • Luke Holman

Abstract

Securing matings is a key determinant of fitness, and in many species, males are the sex that engages in mate searching. Searching for mates is often associated with increased mobility. This elevated investment in movement is predicted to trade-off with sperm competitiveness, but few studies have directly tested whether this trade-off occurs. Here, we assessed whether artificial selection on mobility affected sperm competitiveness and mating behavior, and if increased mobility was due to increased leg length in red flour beetles (Tribolium castaneum). We found that, in general, males selected for decreased mobility copulated for longer, stimulated females more during mating, and tended to be better sperm competitors. Surprisingly, they also had longer legs. However, how well males performed in sperm competition depended on females. Males with reduced mobility always copulated for longer than males with high mobility, but this only translated into greater fertilization success in females from control populations and not the selection populations (i.e. treatment females). These results are consistent with a mate-searching/mating-duration trade-off and broadly support a trade-off between mobility and sperm competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Kentarou Matsumura & C Ruth Archer & David J Hosken & Takahisa Miyatake & Luke Holman, 2019. "Artificial selection on walking distance suggests a mobility-sperm competitiveness trade-off," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(6), pages 1522-1529.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:6:p:1522-1529.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz110
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:6:p:1522-1529.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.