IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i5p1488-1498..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk assessment and the use of novel shortcuts in spatial detouring tasks in jumping spiders

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Aguilar-Argüello
  • Daniel Gerhard
  • Ximena J Nelson
  • Marie Herberstein

Abstract

Selection on individuals that incorporate risk to quickly and accurately make a priori navigational assessments may lead to increased spatial ability. Jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) are characterized by their highly acute vision, which mediates many behaviors, including prey capture and navigation. When moving to a specific goal (prey, nest, a potential mate, etc.), salticids rely on visual cues and spatial memory to orient in 3-dimensional space. Salticid spatial ability has been studied in homing and detour tasks, with Portia being considered one of the most skillful genera in terms of spatial ability in the family. Commonly living in complex environments, salticids are likely to encounter a wide variety of routes that could lead to a goal, and, as selection favors individuals that can accurately make assessments, they may be able to assess alternative route distances to select the most efficient route. Here, we tested whether 2 salticid species (Portia fimbriata and Trite planiceps) can discriminate and assess between different available routes by their length, and riskiness to escape from a stressful scenario. Results suggest that while Portia is more likely to choose the easiest and shortest escape routes, Trite is faster in both decision making about which route to take, and to escape. However, some individuals were able to use novel shortcuts instead of the routes expected, with Portia containing a higher proportion of shortcut-takers than Trite. These differences in spatial ability seem to correspond with the environmental complexity inhabited by each species. Jumping spiders use acute vision to solve complex 3-dimensional tasks, including the use of detours to reach a specific goal. We show that they can assess differences between routes enabling escape from a stressful situation, discriminating routes by length and by riskiness. Differential spatial abilities between closely related species, possibly through selection based on the characteristics of the environment in which each species lives, may explain our results.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Aguilar-Argüello & Daniel Gerhard & Ximena J Nelson & Marie Herberstein, 2019. "Risk assessment and the use of novel shortcuts in spatial detouring tasks in jumping spiders," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(5), pages 1488-1498.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:5:p:1488-1498.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz105
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:5:p:1488-1498.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.