IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i5p1196-1204..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MHC-associated mate choice under competitive conditions in captive versus wild Tasmanian devils

Author

Listed:
  • Jenna Day
  • Rebecca M Gooley
  • Carolyn J Hogg
  • Katherine Belov
  • Camilla M Whittington
  • Catherine E Grueber
  • Luke Holman

Abstract

Mate choice contributes to driving evolutionary processes when animals choose breeding partners that confer genetic advantages to offspring, such as increased immunocompetence. The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is an important group of immunological molecules, as MHC antigens bind and present foreign peptides to T-cells. Recent studies suggest that mates may be selected based on their MHC profile, leading to an association between an individual’s MHC diversity and their breeding success. In conservation, it may be important to consider mate choice in captive breeding programs, as this mechanism may improve reproductive rates. We investigated the reproductive success of Tasmanian devils in a group housing facility to determine whether increased MHC-based heterozygosity led individuals to secure more mating partners and produce more offspring. We also compared the breeding success of captive females to a wild devil population. MHC diversity was quantified using 12 MHC-linked microsatellite markers, including 11 previously characterized markers and one newly identified marker. Our analyses revealed that there was no relationship between MHC-linked heterozygosity and reproductive success either in captivity or the wild. The results of this study suggest that, for Tasmanian devils, MHC-based heterozygosity does not produce greater breeding success and that no specific changes to current captive management strategies are required with respect to preserving MHC diversity. Captive breeding is used to prevent extinction of species worldwide, but the importance of mate choice in captivity is only now being realised. The MHC is a family of genes involved with mate choice. We examined whether MHC diversity contributes to breeding success of captive Tasmanian devils compared to a wild population. Despite large sample sizes, we found no association between MHC diversity and breeding success for devils; these results will inform conservation planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenna Day & Rebecca M Gooley & Carolyn J Hogg & Katherine Belov & Camilla M Whittington & Catherine E Grueber & Luke Holman, 2019. "MHC-associated mate choice under competitive conditions in captive versus wild Tasmanian devils," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(5), pages 1196-1204.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:5:p:1196-1204.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz092
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:5:p:1196-1204.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.