IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i4p975-985..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Context-dependent strategies of food allocation among offspring in a facultative cooperative breeder

Author

Listed:
  • Jianqiang Li
  • Yong Wang
  • Lei Lv
  • Pengcheng Wang
  • Ben J Hatchwell
  • Zhengwang Zhang

Abstract

Natural selection should favor adoption of parental strategies that maximize fitness when allocating investment among offspring. In birds, begging displays often convey information of nestling need and quality, allowing parents to make adaptive food allocation decisions. We investigated how adults utilized cues likely to represent nestling competitive ability (begging position) and need (begging intensity) and a cue independent of nestling control (nestling sex) to distribute food among nestlings in a facultative cooperative breeder, the black-throated tit (Aegithalos concinnus). We found that parents reduced their efforts when helped, suggesting that parents of helped broods would have the potential to satisfy nestling needs more than unhelped parents. This suggestion was supported by the fact that nestling mass increased faster in helped than in unhelped nests. We found no effect of nestling sex on food allocation, but, as predicted, we found that adults responded differently to begging signals in relation to the presence of helpers and brood size. First, helped parents were more responsive to nestling begging intensity than parents without helpers. Second, female parents and helpers had a stronger preference for nestling begging position in large than in small broods. Third, the preference for nestling begging position was greater for unhelped than for helped female parents. These results provide evidence that carers adjust their preference for different offspring begging signals based on availability of food resources. Parental allocation of care among offspring can be influenced by the availability of resources. We show that when black-throated tit parents allocate food, they exhibit a stronger preference for begging intensity (a proxy of nestling need) under better food conditions where a nest has helpers and small broods and a stronger preference for begging position (a proxy of nestling competitive ability) under poor food conditions where a nest has no helpers and large broods.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianqiang Li & Yong Wang & Lei Lv & Pengcheng Wang & Ben J Hatchwell & Zhengwang Zhang, 2019. "Context-dependent strategies of food allocation among offspring in a facultative cooperative breeder," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 975-985.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:975-985.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz037
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Parejo-Pulido & Lorenzo Pérez-Rodríguez & Inmaculada Abril-Colón & Jaime Potti & Tomás Redondo, 2023. "Passive and active parental food allocation in a songbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(5), pages 729-740.
    2. Paula Ferrer-Pereira & Ester Martínez-Renau & Manuel Martín-Vivaldi & Juan José Soler, 2023. "Food supply and provisioning behavior of parents: Are small hoopoe nestlings condemned to die?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(6), pages 992-1001.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:975-985.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.