IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i4p938-947..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral responses vary with prey species in the social spider, Stegodyphus sarasinorum

Author

Listed:
  • Bharat Parthasarathy
  • Hema Somanathan

Abstract

Predators living in social groups often show consistent interindividual differences in prey capture behavior that may be linked to personality. Though personality predisposes individuals for certain behaviors, responses can also be influenced by context. Studies examining personality-dependent participation in prey capture have largely employed only one prey species, offering the predator no choice. In nature, predators encounter a range of prey species, therefore participation in or leading a prey capture event must also depend on prey attributes (e.g., size and risk). In the social spider Stegodyphus sarasinorum, collective prey capture is mediated by personality types as a consequence of which some individuals are consistently more likely to attack. Here, we examined if an individual’s consistency to attack persisted within and between the 2 prey species (honeybees and grasshoppers) and if the same individuals attacked first with both prey species. Our results showed that interindividual differences in attacking persisted within and between the 2 prey species. Spiders showed greater participation in attacking grasshoppers relative to bees. Identities of the first attackers were not the same for bees and grasshoppers. Spiders showed greater consistency over time in attacking bees relative to grasshoppers. Bees attracted fewer attackers than size-matched grasshoppers. These results suggest that greater task specialization may be necessary to successfully subdue bees. Spiders handled bees more cautiously, which is likely to explain the observed plasticity in attacking the 2 prey species. Thus, participation in prey capture in social spiders is influenced by the attributes of prey species. Social spiders collectively capture prey for their large colonies. However, some spiders are more likely to participate by leading attacks or by following attackers while others rarely participate in prey capture. Such differences between individuals are known to be due to individual personalities in social spiders. Here, we show that spiders in a colony show consistency to capture prey, but more importantly and for the first time, we show that participation in capturing prey depends on the prey species itself. The identities of spiders that attacked first were not the same when we used honeybees and grasshoppers as prey. Over time we found that spiders were less consistent in attacking grasshoppers relative to bees. Thus, our results suggest that spiders can modulate their behavioral responses in relation to prey species.

Suggested Citation

  • Bharat Parthasarathy & Hema Somanathan, 2019. "Behavioral responses vary with prey species in the social spider, Stegodyphus sarasinorum," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 938-947.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:938-947.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:938-947.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.