IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i4p928-937..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female choice for related males in wild red-backed toadlets (Pseudophryne coriacea)

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel M O’Brien
  • J Scott Keogh
  • Aimee J Silla
  • Phillip G Byrne

Abstract

Mate choice for genetic benefits is assumed to be widespread in nature, yet very few studies have comprehensively examined relationships between female mate choice and male genetic quality in wild populations. Here, we use exhaustive sampling and single nucleotide polymorphisms to provide a partial test of the “good genes as heterozygosity” hypothesis and the “genetic compatibility” hypothesis in an entire population of terrestrial breeding red-backed toadlets, Pseudophryne coriacea. We found that successful males did not display higher heterozygosity, despite a positive relationship between male heterozygosity and offspring heterozygosity. Rather, in the larger of 2 breeding events, we found that successful males were more genetically similar to their mate than expected under random mating, indicating that females can use pre- or post-copulatory mate choice mechanisms to bias paternity toward more related males. These findings provide no support for the good genes as heterozygosity hypothesis but lend support to the genetic compatibility hypothesis. A complete test of this hypothesis will now require evaluating how parental genetic similarity impacts offspring fitness. Terrestrial toadlets show a high degree of site fidelity, high levels of genetic structuring between populations, and frequently hybridize with sister species. As such, female mate choice for related males may be an adaptive strategy to reduce outbreeding depression. Our findings provide the first population-wide evidence for non-random preferential inbreeding in a wild amphibian. We argue that such reproductive patterns may be common in amphibians because extreme genetic differentiation within meta-populations creates an inherently high risk of outbreeding depression. Matings between relatives could be more common than we think! Using a genomic approach to assess paternity biases in an entire population of red-backed toadlets, we show that females consistently produce offspring sired by kin. Toadlets return to the same ponds to breed each year and are expected to be highly adapted to their local environments. By reproducing with relatives, females might ensure that their offspring retain gene complexes that maximize their survival.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel M O’Brien & J Scott Keogh & Aimee J Silla & Phillip G Byrne, 2019. "Female choice for related males in wild red-backed toadlets (Pseudophryne coriacea)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 928-937.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:928-937.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:928-937.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.