IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i4p914-927..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assortative interactions revealed in a fission–fusion society of Australian humpback dolphins

Author

Listed:
  • Tim N Hunt
  • Simon J Allen
  • Lars Bejder
  • Guido J Parra

Abstract

Understanding individual interactions within a community or population provides valuable insight into its social system, ecology, and, ultimately, resilience against external stimuli. Here, we used photo-identification data, generalized affiliation indices, and social network analyses to investigate dyadic relationships, assortative interactions, and social clustering in the Australian humpback dolphin (Sousa sahulensis). Boat-based surveys were conducted between May 2013 and October 2015 around the North West Cape, Western Australia. Our results indicated a fission–fusion society, characterized by nonrandom dyadic relationships. Assortative interactions were identified both within and between sexes and were higher among members of the same sex, indicating same-sex preferred affiliations and sexual segregation. Assortative interactions by geographic locations were also identified, but with no evidence of distinct social communities or clusters or affiliations based on residency patterns. We noted high residency among females. Models of temporal patterns of association demonstrated variable levels of stability, including stable (preferred companionships) and fluid (casual acquaintances) associations. We also demonstrated some social avoidance. Our results point to greater social complexity than previously recognized for humpback dolphins and, along with knowledge of population size and habitat use, provide the necessary baseline upon which to assess the influence of increasing human activities on this endemic, Vulnerable species. The extent and nature of interactions between males and females has a profound influence on animal social structures. Here, we show that Australian humpback dolphins live in a dynamic, fission–fusion society, characterized by nonrandom and strong same-sex preferred associations. Our results suggest greater social complexity than previously recognized for humpback dolphins and provide the necessary baseline for assessing human impacts on the social structure of this threatened species.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim N Hunt & Simon J Allen & Lars Bejder & Guido J Parra, 2019. "Assortative interactions revealed in a fission–fusion society of Australian humpback dolphins," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 914-927.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:914-927.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:914-927.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.