IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i4p1168-1175..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A benefit to providing information? Flower size cues, plant attractiveness, and plant visit length

Author

Listed:
  • Carla J Essenberg
  • Paige E Guevarra
  • Hadley M Moreau
  • Cody J Jordan
  • Talia Zisman

Abstract

In many plant species, flower size is correlated with the production of floral rewards such as nectar and pollen and, therefore, provides information to pollinators about flower quality. However, how relationships between flower size and rewards influence plant fitness is not well understood. In particular, it is unclear whether indicating to pollinators which flowers are unrewarding harms or benefits plants. We used a laboratory system with artificial flowers to examine bumblebees’ (Bombus impatiens) responses to plants that had flower size as an informative cue (with large flowers rewarding and small flowers unrewarding) as compared with “deceptive” plants that had a mixture of rewarding and unrewarding large flowers and plants with only large, rewarding flowers. Bees had previously foraged in a context in which only large flowers provided rewards. Small flowers were visited less often than large flowers. In comparing plants with different numbers of flowers, we found that small flowers, although they added less to a plant’s attractiveness than large flowers, did increase a plant’s attractiveness if present in sufficient number. Furthermore, plants with informative cues received substantially fewer flower visits per plant visit in comparison with deceptive plants, even when the plants with informative cues had a larger number of flowers. Cues identifying unrewarding flowers could, therefore, reduce rates of within-plant pollen movement, increasing the plant’s fitness gains per flower visit. Their contribution to whole-plant attractiveness and avoidance of inbreeding could help explain why many plants produce small, relatively unrewarding flowers even though pollinators avoid visiting them. Small, unrewarding flowers contribute to a plant’s attractiveness even though bees avoid visiting them. At the same time, having small flowers can cause bees to leave a plant earlier, reducing pollen movement within the plant. These findings, based on observations of foraging bumblebees, may help explain why many plants produce a mixture of larger, more rewarding flowers and smaller, less rewarding flowers, in spite of pollinators’ avoidance of the smaller flowers.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla J Essenberg & Paige E Guevarra & Hadley M Moreau & Cody J Jordan & Talia Zisman, 2019. "A benefit to providing information? Flower size cues, plant attractiveness, and plant visit length," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 1168-1175.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1168-1175.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz065
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1168-1175.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.