IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i4p1087-1095..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rate of intersexual interactions affects injury likelihood in Tasmanian devil contact networks

Author

Listed:
  • David G Hamilton
  • Menna E Jones
  • Elissa Z Cameron
  • Hamish McCallum
  • Andrew Storfer
  • Paul A Hohenlohe
  • Rodrigo K Hamede

Abstract

Identifying the types of contacts that result in disease transmission is important for accurately modeling and predicting transmission dynamics and disease spread in wild populations. We investigated contacts within a population of adult Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus harrisii) over a 6-month period and tested whether individual-level contact patterns were correlated with accumulation of bite wounds. Bite wounds are important in the spread of devil facial tumor disease, a clonal cancer cell line transmitted through direct inoculation of tumor cells when susceptible and infected individuals bite each other. We used multimodel inference and network autocorrelation models to investigate the effects of individual-level contact patterns, identities of interacting partners, and position within the social network on the propensity to be involved in bite-inducing contacts. We found that males were more likely to receive potentially disease-transmitting bite wounds than females, particularly during the mating season when males spend extended periods mate-guarding females. The number of bite wounds individuals received during the mating season was unrelated to any of the network metrics examined. Our approach illustrates the necessity for understanding which contact types spread disease in different systems to assist the management of this and other infectious wildlife diseases. Sex can be a risky business. This is particularly true in Tasmanian devils, where mating can be extremely aggressive. We investigated contact rates and wound patterns in a devil population, and found that males spending long periods in mating interactions with females get wounded at very high rates. This has important repercussions for the spread of a transmissible cancer affecting devil populations, devil facial tumor disease.

Suggested Citation

  • David G Hamilton & Menna E Jones & Elissa Z Cameron & Hamish McCallum & Andrew Storfer & Paul A Hohenlohe & Rodrigo K Hamede, 2019. "Rate of intersexual interactions affects injury likelihood in Tasmanian devil contact networks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 1087-1095.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1087-1095.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz054
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1087-1095.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.