IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i2p446-454..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Better the devil you know? How familiarity and kinship affect prey responses to disturbance cues

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin R Bairos-Novak
  • Adam L Crane
  • Douglas P Chivers
  • Maud C O Ferrari

Abstract

Prey can greatly improve their odds of surviving predator encounters by eavesdropping on conspecific risk cues, but the reliability of these cues depends on both previous accuracy as well as the cue’s relevance. During a predator chase, aquatic prey release chemical disturbance cues that may vary in their reliability depending on the individuals receiving them. Thus, prey may rely differentially on disturbance cues from familiar individuals (due to previous experience) or from kin (due to their relatedness). We examined the responses of wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) tadpoles to disturbance cues from familiar versus unfamiliar conspecifics and kin versus non-kin. In accordance with our prediction, tadpoles responded differently to disturbance cues from familiar versus unfamiliar conspecifics. Tadpoles receiving disturbance cues from unfamiliar individuals displayed a fright response, whereas tadpoles ignored disturbance cues from familiar individuals. Tadpoles may have habituated to familiar cues since they were unaccompanied by a true threat, hence rendering these cues functionally unreliable. Tadpoles responded similarly to disturbance cues from related and unrelated individuals suggesting they were similarly reliable and this mirrors the matching reliability of prey responses to damage-released alarm cues from kin and non-kin. Our findings shed light on a seldom-studied chemical communication system in aquatic prey. Tadpoles trust the chemical cues of strangers over familiar individuals that may have been unreliable about predators in the past. Tadpoles release “disturbance cues” in response to predators that warn of danger to nearby tadpoles, causing them to reduce their movement. We exposed tadpoles to disturbance cues from familiar versus unfamiliar tadpoles, and siblings versus nonsiblings. Interestingly, tadpoles did not respond to cues from familiar tadpoles, but did to strangers, siblings, and non-siblings.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin R Bairos-Novak & Adam L Crane & Douglas P Chivers & Maud C O Ferrari, 2019. "Better the devil you know? How familiarity and kinship affect prey responses to disturbance cues," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(2), pages 446-454.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:2:p:446-454.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ary184
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:2:p:446-454.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.