IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i2p417-425..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local mate competition modifies the costs of mating in a mostly monandrous parasitoid wasp

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca A Boulton
  • Nicola Cook
  • E V (Ginny) Greenway
  • Georgina L Glaser
  • Jade Green
  • David M Shuker

Abstract

The costs and benefits of mating are frequently measured in order to understand why females mate multiply. However, to separate the factors that initiate the evolution of polyandry (from monandry) from the factors that maintain it, we must ascertain how the environmental context changes the economics of mating. Here, we show how context-dependent costs of mating can lead to the evolution of polyandry in a species that is monandrous in the wild, the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis. We have previously shown that when females have insufficient time between mating and gaining access to hosts for oviposition, they appear unable to process sperm effectively and end up overproducing sons (i.e., laying unfertilized eggs, since Nasonia is in haplodiploid). This overproduction of sons is costly due to selection on sex allocation in this species. Although N. vitripennis is monandrous in the wild, polyandry evolves under laboratory culture despite this sex allocation cost. In this study, we show why: when groups of females oviposit together, as they do in laboratory culture, selection on sex allocation via local mate competition (LMC) is reduced, increasing the reproductive value of sons. This relaxes the fitness cost of male production. Overproduction of sons still occurs, but it is penalized less in terms of fitness than when females oviposit alone, under high LMC conditions, as they typically do in the field. Our results highlight how the costs and benefits of mating can vary under different ecologically relevant conditions, in this case the spatiotemporal distribution of resources and competitors, promoting the evolution of polyandry from monandry, and vice versa. Polyandry, or multiple mating by females, is widespread but the factors that promote its evolution are not fully understood. We show that in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis females are penalized for mating multiply when this reduces the time for sperm processing. This cost is lessened when females lay eggs together on hosts. We suggest that this constraint maintains monandry in dispersed natural conditions, but permits polyandry to evolve under mass rearing.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca A Boulton & Nicola Cook & E V (Ginny) Greenway & Georgina L Glaser & Jade Green & David M Shuker, 2019. "Local mate competition modifies the costs of mating in a mostly monandrous parasitoid wasp," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(2), pages 417-425.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:2:p:417-425.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ary181
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:2:p:417-425.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.