IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i1p13-14..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How good does our map of knowledge have to be?: a comment on Berger-Tal et al

Author

Listed:
  • Shinichi Nakagawa
  • Malgorzata Lagisz

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Shinichi Nakagawa & Malgorzata Lagisz, 2019. "How good does our map of knowledge have to be?: a comment on Berger-Tal et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 13-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:1:p:13-14.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ary137
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leigh W. Simmons, 2017. "Guidelines for Transparency and Openness (TOP)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(2), pages 347-347.
    2. Malika Ihle & Isabel S. Winney & Anna Krystalli & Michael Croucher, 2017. "Striving for transparent and credible research: practical guidelines for behavioral ecologists," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(2), pages 348-354.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic evidence synthesis as part of a larger process: a response to comments on Berger-Tal et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 14-15.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Sih & Lea Pollack & Emily Zepeda, 2019. "On using conceptual frameworks to guide a systematic review: a comment on Berger-Tal et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 12-13.
    2. Qianjin Zong & Zhihong Huang & Jiaru Huang, 2023. "Do open science badges work? Estimating the effects of open science badges on an article’s social media attention and research impacts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(6), pages 3627-3648, June.
    3. Isabel S. Winney & Malika Ihle, 2017. "Transparent and credible practices under the microscope: a response to comments on Ihle et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(2), pages 360-361.
    4. Hannah Fraser & Tim Parker & Shinichi Nakagawa & Ashley Barnett & Fiona Fidler, 2018. "Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.
    6. Walter D. Koenig, 2017. "Striving for science that is transparent, credible—and enjoyable: a comment on Ihle et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(2), pages 358-358.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:1:p:13-14.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.