IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v29y2018i1p244-252..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extra-pair paternity is not driven by inbreeding avoidance and does not affect provisioning rates in a cooperatively breeding bird, the noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala)

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Barati
  • Rose L Andrew
  • Jamieson C Gorrell
  • Paul G McDonald
  • Andrea GriffinHandling editor

Abstract

In many bird species, females mate with males other than their social partner, a behavior considered to be beneficial in terms of inbreeding avoidance, or to attract additional care of offspring from EP males. In noisy miners, we show that although 27% of broods contained EP offspring, EP males did not provide help to those broods. Moreover, we did not find evidence that this behavior functions as a mechanism to avoid inbreeding in this species.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Barati & Rose L Andrew & Jamieson C Gorrell & Paul G McDonald & Andrea GriffinHandling editor, 2018. "Extra-pair paternity is not driven by inbreeding avoidance and does not affect provisioning rates in a cooperatively breeding bird, the noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 244-252.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:1:p:244-252.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arx158
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:1:p:244-252.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.