IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v28y2017i4p1160-1165..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predation cost of a sexual signal in the threespine stickleback

Author

Listed:
  • Sini Johnson
  • Ulrika Candolin

Abstract

Lay SummaryThe factors that limit sexual signal expression and ensure honest signaling of mate quality are poorly known. We show that predation risk is a cost of the sexually selected red coloration of the threespine stickleback and, hence, could contribute to signal honesty. A common predator selectively preys on colorful stickleback males in the field, and an experimental study showed that the bright coloration attracts the predator independent of the behavior of the male.

Suggested Citation

  • Sini Johnson & Ulrika Candolin, 2017. "Predation cost of a sexual signal in the threespine stickleback," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 1160-1165.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:4:p:1160-1165.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arx080
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joachim G Frommen & Timo Thünken & Francesca Santostefano & Valentina Balzarini & Attila Hettyey, 2022. "Effects of chronic and acute predation risk on sexual ornamentation and mating preferences [Effects of perceived predation risk and social environment on the development of three-spined stickleback," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 7-16.
    2. Isaac Gravolin & Topi K Lehtonen & Nicholas D S Deal & Ulrika Candolin & Bob B M Wong, 2021. "Male reproductive adjustments to an introduced nest predator," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1163-1170.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:4:p:1160-1165.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.