IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v28y2017i2p391-397..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relative response of songbirds to shifts in song amplitude and song minimum frequency

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Luther
  • Ray Danner
  • Julie Danner
  • Katherine Gentry
  • Elizabeth P. Derryberry

Abstract

Lay Summary Male birds adjust their strength of response to songs modified with increased amplitude and minimum frequency in the presence of loud human noise. In addition, territorial rival males respond more strongly to louder songs than songs with relatively lower minimum frequencies. Thus, increasing song amplitude can compensate for any loss in signal salience due to shifting songs up in minimum frequency. Increasing only song minimum frequency in the context of high noise levels could be maladaptive.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Luther & Ray Danner & Julie Danner & Katherine Gentry & Elizabeth P. Derryberry, 2017. "The relative response of songbirds to shifts in song amplitude and song minimum frequency," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(2), pages 391-397.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:2:p:391-397.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arw172
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:2:p:391-397.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.