IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i5p1567-1578..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade-offs in lactation and milk intake by competing siblings in a fluctuating environment

Author

Listed:
  • Heribert Hofer
  • Sarah Benhaiem
  • Waltraud Golla
  • Marion L. East

Abstract

Income breeders which forage without their offspring in attendance should adjust nursing frequency and the quantity and composition of milk to prevailing ecological conditions, and increase the quantity or quality of milk transferred if the frequency of nursing visits declines. When milk delivery to a litter is insufficient, sibling competition should skew milk consumption in favor of dominant litter members. We quantified milk nutritional composition and gross energy density, nursing bout durations, per capita milk transfer (kg), and milk transfer rate (g/min) per nursing bout in singletons and twins in a social carnivore, the spotted hyena. In our study population, the energetic cost of lactation is rank dependent and particularly high because large fluctuations in local prey abundance necessitate long-distance foraging, reducing nursing frequency and intensifying sibling competition, more frequently for low-ranking than high-ranking females. Females increased milk gross energy density, driven by fat content, and increased nursing bout durations as nursing frequency declined. Milk transfer increased as social status declined. Females below median rank also increased milk transfer as nursing frequency declined. Milk transfer was independent of nursing frequency in females above median rank and higher for singletons than cubs in twin litters. Dominant siblings achieved significantly higher amounts and rates of milk transfer than their paired subordinate littermates; this bias increased as sibling competition intensified. Our results show how the interplay between ecological and social constraints determines the quality and quantity of milk transferred, and how socially dominant siblings use aggression to skew milk intake in their favor.

Suggested Citation

  • Heribert Hofer & Sarah Benhaiem & Waltraud Golla & Marion L. East, 2016. "Trade-offs in lactation and milk intake by competing siblings in a fluctuating environment," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(5), pages 1567-1578.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1567-1578.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arw078
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kat Bebbington & Eleanor A Fairfield & Lewis G Spurgin & Sjouke A Kingma & Hannah Dugdale & Jan Komdeur & David S Richardson & Anna LindholmHandling editor, 2018. "Joint care can outweigh costs of nonkin competition in communal breeders," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 169-178.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1567-1578.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.