IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i5p1515-1521..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection for multicomponent mimicry: equal feature salience and variation in preferred traits

Author

Listed:
  • David W. Kikuchi
  • Johanna Mappes
  • Thomas N. Sherratt
  • Janne K. Valkonen

Abstract

When should multiple traits on Batesian mimics be selected to resemble corresponding traits on model species? Here, we explore two possibilities. First, features of equal salience to predators may be used to categorize prey, selecting for multicomponent mimicry. Second, if different predators use single yet different traits to categorize prey, multicomponent mimicry may still be selected. We studied how blue tits categorized rewarding and unrewarding artificial prey items that are differentiated by a combination of two color dimensions. Many birds used both color dimensions to make decisions, and overall, the population selected for multicomponent mimicry. However, a subset of birds used one color or another to make decisions; among this subset, multicomponent mimicry was also favored. The cost of sampling did not affect selection. Our results suggest that multicomponent warning signals may be selected when traits are equally salient to individual predators, or when communities of predators focus on different traits to discriminate between prey.

Suggested Citation

  • David W. Kikuchi & Johanna Mappes & Thomas N. Sherratt & Janne K. Valkonen, 2016. "Selection for multicomponent mimicry: equal feature salience and variation in preferred traits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(5), pages 1515-1521.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1515-1521.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arw072
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1515-1521.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.