Author
Listed:
- Shay Adar
- Roi Dor
- Inon Scharf
Abstract
The selection of a suitable habitat may maximize the survival and reproduction chances of individuals. We examined the habitat choice of wormlions, small sand-dwelling insects that construct pit-traps to capture prey. Unlike the well-studied antlions, which employ a similar hunting strategy, wormlion behavior has not been thoroughly studied. We first determined whether wormlions prefer 1) shaded versus lit, 2) deep versus shallow sand, and 3) surface-obstructed versus clear microhabitats. The first option of each of the three pairs was highly preferred. In unfavorable microhabitats, larvae were also less likely to construct a pit, mainly in shallow sand, and moved over longer distances. Next, we sought to determine whether the choice is additive (taking more than a single factor into account), hierarchical (ranking the factors according to an order of preference), or based on a threshold rule (accepting a microhabitat that crosses a quality threshold). Combining shade with one of 3 environmental factors – surface obstacles, shallow sand, or high conspecific density – led to lower proportions of wormlions choosing shade. In other words, a combination of shade and any factor was no longer preferred over lit and otherwise favorable microhabitats. We thus conclude that the wormlions’ microhabitat choice is additive, taking more than a single factor into account, and that favorable conditions of any sort are traded-off against one another.
Suggested Citation
Shay Adar & Roi Dor & Inon Scharf, 2016.
"Habitat choice and complex decision making in a trap-building predator,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(5), pages 1491-1498.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1491-1498.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1491-1498.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.